You tell him girlfriend!

Now the most liberal Senator in Congress is a Republican.

Next you'll be saying he gave Hillary the bird.

You know that "truthiness" isn't "truthfulness," right?  

Colbert just goes right over the heads of some people.

1. Obama dissing anti-war and civil rights?  Are you sure you want to go there?  I couldn't find the interview you were talking about in five minutes of Googling, so I'm not sure it's so "famous."

2. The "speech" you're talking about wasn't.  He was answering a question, and flubbed it with phrasology. He did say that Bill Clinton didn't bring back the manufacturing jobs, but that much was reasonably true.  This is something that both Obama and Bill Clinton agree on.  You gotta have a thick skin to be in politics.  Brush it off.

EYES!  You were given them so use them.  

You can use this argument.

But not unless you count Hillary's courting of McCain the war-hero-in-chief, reliance on guilt-by-association character assassination and doubletalk as gruesome as the things you claim here.

not addressing the crux of your argument - but kos is one of the biggest DOUCHES on the internet - and thats saying alot.

Thank you for this diary sooooo much...!!!!

I kept making the point yesterday that Clinton supporters were calling Obama a Republican amid all of the talk yesterday about the reverse and I think it fell on deaf ears (well, eyes, this is a blog)... but today, voila...  we have recent evidence!

Yes, he of most liberal voting record in the Senate is a Republican.

http://time-blog.com/real_clear_politics /2008/01/national_journal_obama_most_li. html

To bad record trumps your rhetoric, but rhetoric is all you got, isn't it?

Insert a quarter and play again!

of the party supports him.

Precisement.  All his hooey about post-partisan this, and reaching across the aisle that, is fairy tale dreamland stuff.  Post-partisanship requires honest brokers on both sides, and Republicans are not honest.  Republicans are not to be trusted, not to be appeased, not to be negotitated with.  Any good Democrat, like Clinton, that knows anything about Republican politics wouldn't trust a wingnut as far as he could throw him/her.

Republicans are to be opposed at every turn, not compromised with.  Knuckling under worked out so well for us so far, hasn't it?

Kos has gone over the deep end.

His Partisanship has blinded him to reality: all he cares about is breaking the color barrier to the White House.  That's it in a nutshell, no questions about it.

As far as Obama goes, his recored is very liberal (as is Hillary's), but in my opinion, he's a chameleon and will fool lots of folks once he is in the office.  He most likely will be the nominee: he has a chance of winning the office, but don't for one minute discount the 'unhappy' GOP voters who are now returning to McCain.  Some of those folks are the ones who assisted Obama in getting to where he is now, what 3% to 4% ahead of Clinton, which is NOT a 'mandate' by any means.  He will not have the cakewalk he has had in the primary process, no sir indeed.

Oh, and I forgot: dKos can slide off the face of the earth as far as I am concerned, especially after Kos's recent declaration about Hillary.  Now THAT deserves a 'bird' if ever anything did!